Re: [boost] scoped_ptr rationale

From: Thomas Witt (witt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-09-21 12:47:47

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Saturday 21 September 2002 19:22, Peter Dimov wrote:
> From: "David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]>
> BTW overplaying copy+swap is a good thing. It's difficult to make a mistake
> when using copy+swap, and it's incredibly easy to make a mistake when
> hand-coding. Even shared_ptr had a bug in its copy+swap-less operator=
> IIRC. Or was it reset?

FWIW it was reset but scoped_ptr.

- --Thomas

- -- 
Dipl.-Ing. Thomas Witt
Institut fuer Verkehrswesen, Eisenbahnbau und -betrieb, Universitaet Hannover
voice: [phone] - 4273, fax: [phone]
http://www.ive.uni-hannover.de
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE9jLDI0ds/gS3XsBoRApdRAJ9EUTgGkOVjIvEmf4jOZ20JYvpWaACeIXUl
xQkwX1qr/eB7kxZeDlzup/4=
=wQj8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----