From: Greg Colvin (Gregory.Colvin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-09-24 22:35:40
At 07:35 PM 9/24/2002, you wrote:
>At Tuesday 2002/09/24 12:32, you wrote:
>>--- "Victor A. Wagner, Jr." <vawjr_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>> Let's start with I'm a more than a little miffed at what I've found. At
>>> whom my miffedness should be directed is unclear.
>>Hey, no reason to be upset. Things grow, and what was acceptable 10 years ago
>>is slowly becoming unworkable: sticking include files in a "global namespace."
Works fine for me, where appropriate.
>>Here is what you do:
>>- Convince the C and C++ standard folks to move everything into the "include
>>name space std"; e.g.:
>>Doesn't that look neat?
>yes it looks neat (tho I'd use <std/cstdio>)
We already have <cstdio> to put things in std.
So, you write the above as
Or am I missing something?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk