From: Yitzhak Sapir (yitzhaks_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-10-02 14:29:13
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Abrahams [mailto:dave_at_[hidden]]
> From: "Yitzhak Sapir" <yitzhaks_at_[hidden]>
> > We have two objects that behave the same. const auto_ptr, and const
> scoped_ptr. Why not specialize one to handle one case people
> use over and
> over, and the other to handle a different one?
> Because you can't specialize const T?
Could you expand please? In that paragraph I don't mean specialize in the sense of
C++ partial specialization. I mean specialize in terms of library design. "Give this
class/template one specific role and this class/template a different specific role." I
meant "specialize" in that sense. If I didn't understand your question, could you
> [It'd be nice if you could turn on line-wrapping in your
> mailer, especially
> because some people like to reply immediately following quoted text,
> without a blank line to separate.]
I'll try to see if there's something like it but right now I don't see such an option.
I use Microsoft Outlook with as many as possible settings set to Plain Text
(because I need to). At least for this mail, I tried doing this manually. Now I
understand why all the replies to me looked funny. :-)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk