Re: [boost] [smart_ptr] const-correctness as function argument

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-10-02 12:57:00

From: "Yitzhak Sapir" <yitzhaks_at_[hidden]>

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: David Abrahams [mailto:dave_at_[hidden]]
>
> >
> > From: "Yitzhak Sapir" <yitzhaks_at_[hidden]>
> >
> > > We have two objects that behave the same.  const auto_ptr, and const
> > scoped_ptr.  Why not specialize one to handle one case people
> > use over and
> > over, and the other to handle a different one?
> >
> > Because you can't specialize const T?
>
> Could you expand please? In that paragraph I don't mean specialize in the
sense of
> C++ partial specialization.

Oh. That's all I meant.

> > [It'd be nice if you could turn on line-wrapping in your
> > mailer, especially
> > because some people like to reply immediately following quoted text,
> > without a blank line to separate.]
>
> I'll try to see if there's something like it but right now I don't see
such an option.
> I use Microsoft Outlook with as many as possible settings set to Plain
Text
> (because I need to).  At least for this mail, I tried doing this
manually.  Now I
> understand why all the replies to me looked funny. :-)

Better, though probably a bit wide.
There's an option in there somewhere; I used to use Outlook (for about 10
minutes).

-Dave
-----------------------------------------------------------
           David Abrahams * Boost Consulting
dave_at_[hidden] * http://www.boost-consulting.com