Boost logo

Boost :

From: Yitzhak Sapir (yitzhaks_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-10-08 14:38:19

> From: Yitzhak Sapir

> The compile time complexity is O(1) for operator* and O(1)
> for operator++,
> because I build compile-time static data structures to hold
> each value of
> the iteration. But the iterator still can't be random access.

I meant the run time complexity for the compile time case.
The compile time complexity for building the tables is
probably closer to n^2 though it could probably be

And I know I'm probably missing lots of "typename"s. But,
unfortunately, my compiler isn't compliant, and I don't
have experience in putting typenames in the right place,
and I believe such experience can only be built with a
compiler that would complain when you have something
wrong. So if there is anyone that could suggest his or her
help in fixing up the typenames, or at least a suitable
compiler to use, would they please offer their advice?
Would Borland 5.5 work? (I have that).

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at