Boost logo

Boost :

From: Vincent Finn (vincent_finn_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-10-09 10:55:56

Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
>>>I think that the stuff you downloaded need some refractoring regarding
>>>hearder files. I'm considering
>>>two alternatives:
>>>... <one for each header>
>>>/imap.hpp // all map stuff
>>>/iseq.hpp // vector, deque
>>>/iadap.hpp // stack queue
>>>In the last approach one would also need some config macros s.t.
> libraries
>>>without hash based containers canuse the same header. A third
>>>alternative would be to provide fine granularity for those who wants it
> and
>>>a really big chunk as now. Suggestions are welcome.
>>Sounds good, minimize dependencies and all that.
> so which is better?

I'd prefer the first one
but I'm sure a lot of people will object to the names being so similar
to the standard headers

With the second one I'd go with fuller names
iseq.hpp -> isequential.hpp
or even -> init_sequential.hpp

I would mainly go for that because it took me a while to figure out what
seq stood for !! :-|


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at