|
Boost : |
From: Thomas Witt (witt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-10-09 09:55:50
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 08 October 2002 19:49, Beman Dawes wrote:
> At 01:16 PM 10/4/2002, Gennaro Prota wrote:
> >For my personal information, what does it happen in general if so few
> >people express their votes? Does Boost acknowledge the review result
> >anyway?
>
> It is up to the Review Manager.
>
> In my personal opinion, if a library is simple, transparent, and doesn't
> generate serious negative comments then I think it should be accepted even
> if only a small number of people are willing to post a review.
>
> OTOH, libraries which are complex, opaque, or generate serious negative
> comments clearly need more eyes looking at them.
That would have been my answer. I just didn't want to stir the discussion
during the review.
- --Thomas
- --
Dipl.-Ing. Thomas Witt
Institut fuer Verkehrswesen, Eisenbahnbau und -betrieb, Universitaet Hannover
voice: +49(0) 511 762 - 4273, fax: +49(0) 511 762-3001
http://www.ive.uni-hannover.de
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE9pEN60ds/gS3XsBoRAj3aAJ0W8Vsvwa6e1QcBL31nqAiPFoHAFACfbAvB
pDXW4XJw7yFDO2UHePXTKs0=
=lOA9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk