Re: [boost] Re: new initialization lib, any interest?

From: Thorsten Ottosen (nesotto_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-10-09 10:12:37

> > I think that the stuff you downloaded need some refractoring regarding
> > hearder files. I'm considering
> > two alternatives:
> >
> > /init/vector.hpp
> > /init/deque.hpp
> > ... <one for each header>
> > /enum.hpp
> >
> > or
> >
> > /imap.hpp // all map stuff
> > /iseq.hpp   // vector, deque
> > /iset.hpp
> > /iadap.hpp // stack queue
> > /enum.hpp
> >
> > In the last approach one would also need some config macros s.t.
libraries
> > without hash based containers canuse the same header. A third
> > alternative would be to provide fine granularity for those who wants it
and
> > a really big chunk as now. Suggestions are welcome.
>
> Sounds good, minimize dependencies and all that.
>
> Vin

so which is better?

-Thorsten