From: Samuel Krempp (krempp_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-10-09 18:43:12
Le mer 09/10/2002 à 12:52, John Maddock a écrit :
> > Are there any plans for testing more often and on more gcc versions for
> > example: 2.95.3 (most common) and 3.2 (latest stable)?
> There are linux regression tests which I admit are a few days out of date
but they also dont use any gcc more recent than 3.1.
Is it possible to replace it by 3.2 ?
Also, is it intentionnal that the gcc-3.1 used in the tests (linux and
win32) is broken wrt wchar_t ? It might be a general gcc-3.1 bug, but I
doubt such a problem appeared then disappeared between 3.0.4 and 3.2
(both those versions pass the tests on my linux box).
anyhow, I've added a check on BOOST_NO_STD_WSTRING plus
BOOST_NO_STD_WSTREAM that should make the tests pass with this gcc.
(Or should I just move the wchar specific tests into a specific,
well-named file so that people can see those failures ?)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk