From: John Maddock (jm_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-10-11 06:00:54
>Is it possible to replace it by 3.2 ?
Eventually, probably not before the next release from my perspective though
>Also, is it intentionnal that the gcc-3.1 used in the tests (linux and
>win32) is broken wrt wchar_t ? It might be a general gcc-3.1 bug, but I
>doubt such a problem appeared then disappeared between 3.0.4 and 3.2
>(both those versions pass the tests on my linux box).
On win32, cygwin has no wide character support, on linux I think it depends
upon the glibc version and it's setup, for some reason my linux install of
gcc3 doesn't enable wide character support even though it is present in the
library, I'm hoping gcc3.2 will fix this when I eventually get around to it.
>anyhow, I've added a check on BOOST_NO_STD_WSTRING plus
>BOOST_NO_STD_WSTREAM that should make the tests pass with this gcc.
>(Or should I just move the wchar specific tests into a specific,
>well-named file so that people can see those failures ?)
Personally yes I would put those into separate tests, but it's up to you.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk