From: Joel de Guzman (djowel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-10-13 04:10:11
----- Original Message -----
From: "Hartmut Kaiser" <hartmutkaiser_at_[hidden]>
> Joel de Guzman wrote:
> > A solution I have in mind is make the rule class accept a
> > bool template parameter ... bool copyable = false>. When one
> > needs to deal with dynamic parsing which will involve the
> > manipulation of rules, placing them in stacks, maps, vectors etc.,
> > then she can set it to true. All the rest will be happy with this
> > set to false as default.
> Seem to solve all problems at once: no confusion anymore for the average
> Spirit user and the possibility to fine tune things for special cases.
> This BTW reflects the situation, we had in Spirit V1.3, there the rule<>
> had the 'non-confusing' semantics and the copyable_rule<> the sematics,
> the rule<> have today. One note though: we need to expose the actual
> rule semantics through a typedef to allow for meta tricks.
Agreed. In addition, we'll need some means to bidirectionally assign from
both types of rules.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk