From: Thorsten Ottosen (nesotto_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-10-13 04:38:04
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dirk Gerrits" <dirk_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Saturday, October 12, 2002 3:35 PM
Subject: [boost] Re: new initialization lib, any interest? (ThorstenOttosen)
> Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
> > ? An alternative. For those who want paranthesis I could provide
> > like
> > m += _(1,2), _(2,3);
> > by makeing a class '_'?
> Just below the table at
> http://www.boost.org/libs/python/doc/v2/Jun2002.html it is mentioned
> that this might conflict with GNU Gettext.
those programs would then have to use the comma list. Just another example
how irritating very short named macros are.
> But on the other hand, doesn't the MPL's lambda facility use _ as well?
dunno. The problem would be less since it's not a macro ( I pressume it's
not). The two '_'s will
be in different namespaces.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk