Re: [boost] Re: new initialization lib, any interest? (ThorstenOttosen)

From: Thorsten Ottosen (nesotto_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-10-13 04:38:04

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dirk Gerrits" <dirk_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Saturday, October 12, 2002 3:35 PM
Subject: [boost] Re: new initialization lib, any interest? (ThorstenOttosen)

> Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
> > ?  An alternative. For those who want paranthesis I could provide
something
> > like
> >
> > m += _(1,2), _(2,3);
> >
> > by makeing a class '_'?
>
> Just below the table at
> http://www.boost.org/libs/python/doc/v2/Jun2002.html it is mentioned
> that this might conflict with GNU Gettext.
those programs would then have to use the comma list. Just another example
of
how irritating very short named macros are.

> But on the other hand, doesn't the MPL's lambda facility use _ as well?

dunno. The problem would be less since it's not a macro ( I pressume it's
not). The two '_'s will
be in different namespaces.

regards

Thorsten