From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-10-17 07:19:38
> David Abrahams writes:
> > I suggest the following simple rewrite:
> > "An object [1.8, 1.9] is accessible from multiple threads
> > if it is of static storage duration (static, extern) [3.7.1],
> > or if a pointer or reference to it is accessible from multiple
> > threads."
> > End of story.
> Except that it isn't --- the pointers and references need not
> themselves be accessible from multiple threads for the pointed- or
> referred-to object to be accessible from mutlple threads, if the
> pointers or references are _copies_ of values accessible from
> multiple threads.
Fair enough. Yep, this wording is hard to get right. Got a suggestion?
-- David Abrahams dave_at_[hidden] * http://www.boost-consulting.com Building C/C++ Extensions for Python: Dec 9-11, Austin, TX http://www.enthought.com/training/building_extensions.html
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk