|
Boost : |
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-10-20 10:26:02
"Paul Mensonides" <pmenso57_at_[hidden]> writes:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]>
>
> > I don't know what you mean by option 3. If it causes a glorious and
> > loud preprocessor failure, I like that best. If it fails silently, I
> > am somwhat ambivalent.
>
> It causes a preprocessing failure (i.e. a "glorious and loud one").
Then why in the world would anyone want saturation instead? That will
just cover bugs.
-- David Abrahams dave_at_[hidden] * http://www.boost-consulting.com Building C/C++ Extensions for Python: Dec 9-11, Austin, TX http://www.enthought.com/training/building_extensions.html
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk