From: Paul Mensonides (pmenso57_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-10-20 12:41:53
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]>
> > > I don't know what you mean by option 3. If it causes a glorious and
> > > loud preprocessor failure, I like that best. If it fails silently, I
> > > am somwhat ambivalent.
> > It causes a preprocessing failure (i.e. a "glorious and loud one").
> Then why in the world would anyone want saturation instead? That will
> just cover bugs.
That is why I'm asking. The arithmetic in the library currently does
saturation arithmetic. At this point, Joel says "saturation for sure," and
you [David] say error instead. I currently have it working with saturation,
but I can remove the saturation an cause an error. I really don't know what
the best course of action here is--which is why I'm asking.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk