From: Neal D. Becker (nbecker_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-10-24 11:13:06
>>>>> "Dan" == Dan Mcleran <dan.mcleran_at_[hidden]> writes:
Dan> 1D Numerical Integration
Dan> I have replied to my own post to start a discussion on the interface for a
Dan> 1D numerical integration library. It seems that most everyone agrees that
Dan> separation of the interface for 1D, 2D, etc. is the right thing to do. I
Dan> also think everyone agrees that 1D numerical integration is straightforward
Dan> and could be part of boost.
Dan> Here are what I would suggest to be the high-level requirements for
Dan> whichever direction we go for 1D numerical integration:
Dan> 1. They must be able to integrate a user-defined function from point a to
Dan> point b in increments of deltax.
I think it should be more general. deltax does not need to be fixed.
The romberg integration routine I am using chooses the points
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk