Re: [boost] Re: Numerical Integration - continued

From: Neal D. Becker (nbecker_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-10-24 11:13:06

>>>>> "Dan" == Dan Mcleran <dan.mcleran_at_[hidden]> writes:

    Dan> 1D Numerical Integration
    Dan> All,

    Dan> I have replied to my own post to start a discussion on the interface for a
    Dan> 1D numerical integration library. It seems that most everyone agrees that
    Dan> separation of the interface for 1D, 2D, etc. is the right thing to do. I
    Dan> also think everyone agrees that 1D numerical integration is straightforward
    Dan> and could be part of boost.

    Dan> Here are what I would suggest to be the high-level requirements for
    Dan> whichever direction we go for 1D numerical integration:

    Dan> 1. They must be able to integrate a user-defined function from point a to
    Dan> point b in increments of deltax.

I think it should be more general.  deltax does not need to be fixed.
The romberg integration routine I am using chooses the points
adaptively.