From: Dan Mcleran (dan.mcleran_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-10-25 10:32:17
"Neal D. Becker" <nbecker_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> >>>>> "Dan" == Dan Mcleran <dan.mcleran_at_[hidden]> writes:
> Dan> 1D Numerical Integration
> Dan> All,
> Dan> I have replied to my own post to start a discussion on the
interface for a
> Dan> 1D numerical integration library. It seems that most everyone
> Dan> separation of the interface for 1D, 2D, etc. is the right thing
to do. I
> Dan> also think everyone agrees that 1D numerical integration is
> Dan> and could be part of boost.
> Dan> Here are what I would suggest to be the high-level requirements
> Dan> whichever direction we go for 1D numerical integration:
> Dan> 1. They must be able to integrate a user-defined function from
point a to
> Dan> point b in increments of deltax.
> I think it should be more general. deltax does not need to be fixed.
> The romberg integration routine I am using chooses the points
In your algorithm, does the user pass in an acceptable error so the adaptive
integration knows when to stop? Does your algorithm build a Romberg table?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk