From: Paul A. Bristow (boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-10-24 15:53:55
I understand what you are saying now, and an reassured that the Interval Library
can do all the things that I expect.
PS Your english is excellent - much better than my french!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
> [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]]On Behalf Of Guillaume Melquiond
> Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 5:35 PM
> To: Boost mailing list
> Subject: RE: [boost] two_pi or pi_twice?
> On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Paul A. Bristow wrote:
> > > If you already have 'pi_i', there is no need for 'pi_iu', is it?
> What I wanted to say is that: I don't know of any constant whose 'unsigned
> int' value would be different from its 'signed int' value (except for the
> maximal values as I already explained). So there is no reason to have
> 'something_iu' and 'something_i' since the two of them are convertible. Am
> I missing something?
> > Should I be surprised that you seem to be suggesting that the Interval
> > Library would not handle unsigned integers?
> My poor english knowledge doesn't permit me to fully understand what you
> mean by this question. But just to make it clear, the Interval Library
> doesn't have any problem with unsigned integers.
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk