Re: Jamfile vs. jamfile vs. Jamfile.jam vs jamfile.jam (was... [boost] ** type traits broken **)

From: Malte Starostik (malte_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-10-28 13:21:35

Am Montag, 28. Oktober 2002 06:33 schrieb Rene Rivera:
> "jamfile" has the disadvantages that:
> - then we have a bunch of "Jamfile" to "jamfile" renames to ask SourceForge
> to do.
> - Windows, KDE, and Gnome users don't have a convenient extension to map to
> their editor.
Except that KDE uses a combination of filename patterns and MIME magic to 
determine a file's type and not something as arbitrary and archaic as an 
extension unless it has to :-) So does GNOME AFAIK.

SCNR,
-Malte