Re: Jamfile vs. jamfile vs. Jamfile.jam vs jamfile.jam (was... [boost] ** type traits broken **)

From: Rene Rivera (grafik666_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-10-28 13:35:41

[2002-10-28] Malte Starostik wrote:

>Am Montag, 28. Oktober 2002 06:33 schrieb Rene Rivera:
>> "jamfile" has the disadvantages that:
>> - then we have a bunch of "Jamfile" to "jamfile" renames to ask
SourceForge
>> to do.
>> - Windows, KDE, and Gnome users don't have a convenient extension to map
to
>> their editor.
>Except that KDE uses a combination of filename patterns and MIME magic to 
>determine a file's type and not something as arbitrary and archaic as an 
>extension unless it has to :-) So does GNOME AFAIK.

Not sure about KDE, but GNOME uses MIME with file exntensions to map to
programs.

-- grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- rrivera_at_[hidden] - grafik_at_[hidden]
-- 102708583_at_icq - Grafik666_at_AIM - Grafik_at_[hidden]