From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-10-29 00:28:29
Dave Gomboc <dave_at_[hidden]> writes:
> > Historical baggage ;-) It will be possible with V2 to use the lowercase
> > version "jamfile", or even "jamfile.jam". And perhaps we should decide now
> > what the preferred name for jamfiles should be from V2 onwards.
> > Possibilities for V2 are: Jamfile, jamfile, Jamfile.jam, or jamfile.jam.
> If using an extension, maybe .bjam to avoid confusion for Perforce
> jam users on OSes that associate file extensions?
Naw, those guys all use 'Jamfile' and that's it.
-- David Abrahams dave_at_[hidden] * http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk