Re: [boost] jamfile name; is_POD name

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-10-29 00:28:29

Dave Gomboc <dave_at_[hidden]> writes:

> > Historical baggage ;-) It will be possible with V2 to use the lowercase
> > version "jamfile", or even "jamfile.jam". And perhaps we should decide now
> > what the preferred name for jamfiles should be from V2 onwards.
> > Possibilities for V2 are: Jamfile, jamfile, Jamfile.jam, or jamfile.jam.
> 
> If using an extension, maybe .bjam to avoid confusion for Perforce 
> jam users on OSes that associate file extensions?

Naw, those guys all use 'Jamfile' and that's it.

-- 
                    David Abrahams
dave_at_[hidden] * http://www.boost-consulting.com