|
Boost : |
From: Arkadiy Vertleyb (vertleyb_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-10-31 19:10:51
"Joachim Achtzehnter" <joachim_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:Pine.WNT.4.43.0210311521220.159-100000_at_van4.netacquire.com...
> This is definitely interesting. With respect to relational programing I
> think Chris Date's recent ideas about how the relational model should be
> interpreted/used are especially relevant. In that context the current
> implementation has a significant shortcoming: It doesn't easily support
> columns whose type is a relation itself.
>
> Joachim
I don't see any problem with this.
A column can be of ANY type, so we should be able to have a column that
itself is a table. I will try this.
Arkadiy
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk