From: Joel de Guzman (djowel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-11-03 00:35:49
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joel de Guzman" <djowel_at_[hidden]>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Arkadiy Vertleyb" <vertleyb_at_[hidden]>
> > By the way, I think the 1st macro is less problematic than the 2nd one. The
> > COLUMN macro is used for declarations, so, if we see something like
> > following (we would like the name RTL, which maybe too ambitious :o) ):
> FWIW, boost::gtdl had to change its name to boost_date_time.
Whoops. Typing too fast. That should be boost::date_time.
> Acronyms are frowned upon, AFAIK. the name boost::stl wouldn't
> make it if stl was submitted to boost, I think ;o/
> ...I may be mistaken though ...
> Anyway, I suggest that we leave this issue for now. Keep up
> the good work. In the near future, I'm sure someone will come
> up with a nice syntax. I haven't looked at the code in detail yet.
> Perhaps I might be able to suggest something later as I get
> to know more about the library.
> Keep up the good work! :-)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk