From: Joel de Guzman (djowel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-11-03 00:18:07
----- Original Message -----
From: "Arkadiy Vertleyb" <vertleyb_at_[hidden]>
> By the way, I think the 1st macro is less problematic than the 2nd one. The
> COLUMN macro is used for declarations, so, if we see something like
> following (we would like the name RTL, which maybe too ambitious :o) ):
FWIW, boost::gtdl had to change its name to boost_date_time.
Acronyms are frowned upon, AFAIK. the name boost::stl wouldn't
make it if stl was submitted to boost, I think ;o/
...I may be mistaken though ...
Anyway, I suggest that we leave this issue for now. Keep up
the good work. In the near future, I'm sure someone will come
up with a nice syntax. I haven't looked at the code in detail yet.
Perhaps I might be able to suggest something later as I get
to know more about the library.
Keep up the good work! :-)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk