From: John Maddock (jm_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-11-04 06:31:13
> This is bad. We have a release which is tagged Version_1_29_0. Should
> we move the Version_1_29_0 tag on the appropriate files after applying
> the neccessary patches, thus making Version_1_29_0 different from the
> release archive, or should we leave the tag where it is, thus making
> Version_1_29_0 broken in CVS for all time?
I guess we don't have any choice but move the tag, the lesson is clear -
don't end up having to rename files!
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk