Re: [boost] is_pod.hpp change and RC_1_29_0

From: John Maddock (jm_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-11-04 06:31:13

> This is bad. We have a release which is tagged Version_1_29_0. Should
> we move the Version_1_29_0 tag on the appropriate files after applying
> the neccessary patches, thus making Version_1_29_0 different from the
> release archive, or should we leave the tag where it is, thus making
> Version_1_29_0 broken in CVS for all time?

I guess we don't have any choice but move the tag, the lesson is clear -
don't end up having to rename files!

John Maddock
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/john_maddock/index.htm