Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Jeff Garland (jeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-11-04 08:14:11

Next message: Jeff Garland: "RE: [boost] Compiler status tables?"
Previous message: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] Re: status/Jamfile messed up for type_traits..."
Maybe in reply to: Thomas Witt: "[boost] is_pod.hpp change and RC_1_29_0"

> I guess we don't have any choice but move the tag, the lesson is
clear -
> don't end up having to rename files!

Why not create a new tag: RC_1_29_0_is_pod_fix so that this
can be the basis for 1_29_1?

Jeff

Next message: Jeff Garland: "RE: [boost] Compiler status tables?"
Previous message: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] Re: status/Jamfile messed up for type_traits..."
Maybe in reply to: Thomas Witt: "[boost] is_pod.hpp change and RC_1_29_0"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk