Boost logo

Boost :

From: Gennaro Prota (gennaro_prota_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-11-11 08:34:39

On Mon, 11 Nov 2002 10:36:57 +0100, Daniel Frey
<daniel.frey_at_[hidden]> wrote:

>I agree to the rest
>of the discussion that this should be stable and independent of compiler

But are you speaking in general or for the sake of the test? :-)
Because in the latter case it's quite obvious. In the former, this is
a better argument to disagree with my disagreement: suppose the
function f() is in a pre-compiled library. Now, go down to the
implementation level and think of the possible calling conventions

   class A {};
   A f();
   A a = f();

That begins to be off-topic though (and beyond the scope of the
standard), so I will not go on.


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at