Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Kevin S. Van Horn (Kevin.VanHorn_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-11-15 11:42:24

Next message: Mat Marcus: "Re: [boost] Re: MPL lambda"
Previous message: Dirk Gerrits: "[boost] Re: Serialization Library Review"
Maybe in reply to: Kevin S. Van Horn: "[boost] Proposed Boost Assert -- once again"
Next in thread: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] Proposed Boost Assert -- once again"
Reply: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] Proposed Boost Assert -- once again"

Peter Dimov writes:

> Making [Boost Assert] more suitable for application-level use may mean
> that it becomes unacceptable for some Boost libraries.

Can you give me a for-instance? I don't see the conflict.

Next message: Mat Marcus: "Re: [boost] Re: MPL lambda"
Previous message: Dirk Gerrits: "[boost] Re: Serialization Library Review"
Maybe in reply to: Kevin S. Van Horn: "[boost] Proposed Boost Assert -- once again"
Next in thread: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] Proposed Boost Assert -- once again"
Reply: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] Proposed Boost Assert -- once again"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk