From: Dirk Gerrits (dirk_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-11-15 11:33:31
Thomas Matelich wrote:
> Anyway, seemed like a nice package for general use. My company is
> currently in love with XML, so I probably wouldn't be using it for our
> commercial products.
Maybe you missed it due to only skimming the documentation, but it is
possible to write your own archive types for use with the library. An
XML output archive should be pretty easy, and I imagine that given an
XML parser, an input archive should also be quite feasable.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk