From: Douglas Gregor (gregod_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-12-07 09:06:28
On Saturday 07 December 2002 06:47 am, John Maddock wrote:
> Maybe we need something new for those folks: something like
> BOOST_NO_WORKAROUNDS or whatever, that disables all compiler workarounds?
> To keep things centralised BOOST_NO_WORKAROUNDS should be defined by the
> compiler config when the compilers version is greater than the last known
> version and BOOST_STRICT_CONFIG is set, then boost workaround-code need
> only check for the presence of BOOST_NO_WORKAROUNDS or whatever in addition
> to the compiler version.
> How does this sound?
> John Maddock
I like it.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk