From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-12-10 10:54:43
Toon Knapen <toon.knapen_at_[hidden]> writes:
> Long time ago I inquired if it would be a good idea to provide STL extensions
> in boost that are not implemented by all STL's. IIRC David A responded that
> boost/compatibility was intended for this.
That sort of surprises me. I think they should go in boost, for sure,
but I thought the compatibility library was about fixing broken
std library implementations. This is really Ralf's bailiwick, though.
-- David Abrahams dave_at_[hidden] * http://www.boost-consulting.com Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk