Re: [boost] Re: Call for Volunteers [license review]

From: Joel de Guzman (djowel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-12-11 18:01:34

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Joel de Guzman" <djowel_at_[hidden]>

> PS> One question: Why is GPL not in the list? I assume it's because
> it is known to fail the given criteria? Correct me if I'm mistaken. If so, the
> wxWindows Library License should also be out of the list.  wxWindows
> Library License states that:
> 
> This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under
> the terms of the GNU Library General Public Licence as published by the
> Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the Licence, or (at your option)
> any later version.

Whoops, I'm sorry, I didn't catch the Library in "GNU Library General Public 
Licence". So then, consider wxWindows Library License done as it is the same
as LGPL.

Joel de Guzman
joel_at_[hidden]
http://www.boost-consulting.com