From: Daniel Frey (daniel.frey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-12-16 07:58:43
given the Standard's wording in 3.9/1:
"... There are two kinds of types: fundamental types and compound types.
isn't the current implementation of is_compound overly complex? Can't we
just change it to basically match:
is_compound = !is_fundamental
given a working version of is_fundamental of course, but this seems
easier than providing an always safe and portable is_class or other
stuff required for the current version.
-- Daniel Frey aixigo AG - financial training, research and technology Schloß-Rahe-Straße 15, 52072 Aachen, Germany fon: +49 (0)241 936737-42, fax: +49 (0)241 936737-99 eMail: daniel.frey_at_[hidden], web: http://www.aixigo.de
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk