From: John Maddock (jm_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-12-17 06:59:45
given the Standard's wording in 3.9/1:
"... There are two kinds of types: fundamental types and compound types.
isn't the current implementation of is_compound overly complex? Can't we
just change it to basically match:
is_compound = !is_fundamental
given a working version of is_fundamental of course, but this seems
easier than providing an always safe and portable is_class or other
stuff required for the current version.
I think you may be on to something, I'll try it out when I have a chance,
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk