Boost logo

Boost :

From: John Maddock (jm_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-12-17 06:59:45

given the Standard's wording in 3.9/1:

"... There are two kinds of types: fundamental types and compound types.

isn't the current implementation of is_compound overly complex? Can't we
just change it to basically match:

  is_compound = !is_fundamental

given a working version of is_fundamental of course, but this seems
easier than providing an always safe and portable is_class or other
stuff required for the current version.

Regards, Daniel


I think you may be on to something, I'll try it out when I have a chance,

John Maddock

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at