Re: [boost] Proposal: Identifying libraries

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-12-17 08:59:39

From: "Beman Dawes" <bdawes_at_[hidden]>
> At 01:10 PM 12/16/2002, Peter Dimov wrote:
>
>  >but how does this affect (implementation detail) headers that aren't
>  >necessarily part of a specific library?
> boost/detail/lightweight_mutex.hpp,
>  >boost/assert.hpp, boost/throw_exception.hpp, for example.
>
> Good question.  It seems to me every header should have a home
> library.  Probably "utility" for your examples.

My concern is that "utility" would be listed as a dependency, and this isn't
really the case.