From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-12-17 08:59:39
From: "Beman Dawes" <bdawes_at_[hidden]>
> At 01:10 PM 12/16/2002, Peter Dimov wrote:
> >but how does this affect (implementation detail) headers that aren't
> >necessarily part of a specific library?
> >boost/assert.hpp, boost/throw_exception.hpp, for example.
> Good question. It seems to me every header should have a home
> library. Probably "utility" for your examples.
My concern is that "utility" would be listed as a dependency, and this isn't
really the case.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk