From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-12-17 11:05:00
At 08:59 AM 12/17/2002, Peter Dimov wrote:
>From: "Beman Dawes" <bdawes_at_[hidden]>
>> At 01:10 PM 12/16/2002, Peter Dimov wrote:
>> >but how does this affect (implementation detail) headers that aren't
>> >necessarily part of a specific library?
>> >boost/assert.hpp, boost/throw_exception.hpp, for example.
>> Good question. It seems to me every header should have a home
>> library. Probably "utility" for your examples.
>My concern is that "utility" would be listed as a dependency, and this
>isn't really the case.
Good point. Maybe the default should be to report dependencies on a per
library basis, but that there was a way to say "report this one on a per
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk