From: Howard Hinnant (hinnant_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-12-17 09:52:07
> isn't the current implementation of is_compound overly complex? Can't
> just change it to basically match:
> is_compound = !is_fundamental
> given a working version of is_fundamental of course, but this seems
> easier than providing an always safe and portable is_class or other
> stuff required for the current version.
> Regards, Daniel
On Tuesday, December 17, 2002, at 06:59 AM, John Maddock wrote:
> I think you may be on to something, I'll try it out when I have a
Fwiw, is_compound = !is_fundamental is how the Metrowerks version of
this utility has been implemented for the last few years.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk