Boost logo

Boost :

From: Paul Mensonides (pmenso57_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-01-02 02:12:53


----- Original Message -----
From: "Aleksey Gurtovoy" <agurtovoy_at_[hidden]>

> No, that's not the reason, at least not mine :). The practical
consequences
> do not outweigh the aesthetic ones, they are on the same side, here. Even
if
> classes by default provided 'public' access to their members, so instead
of

No it doesn't! By default, all members of a UDT specified with 'class' are
private and inheritance is private by default. 'struct' is the exact
opposite.

Paul Mensonides


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk