Boost logo

Boost :

From: Paul Mensonides (pmenso57_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-01-02 02:16:35

----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Mensonides" <pmenso57_at_[hidden]>

> > No, that's not the reason, at least not mine :). The practical
> consequences
> > do not outweigh the aesthetic ones, they are on the same side, here.
> if
> > classes by default provided 'public' access to their members, so instead
> of
> No it doesn't! By default, all members of a UDT specified with 'class'
> private and inheritance is private by default. 'struct' is the exact
> opposite.

Whoa, sorry Aleksey, I misread it as "Even classes...."

Paul Mensonides

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at