Re: [boost] Re: Small thing: yes_type and no_type made public?

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-01-08 15:14:35

hartmutkaiser_at_[hidden] (Hartmut Kaiser) writes:

>
> //  The following expands to   
> //
> //	typedef char (&sizeN_t)[N];
> //
> //  for N = 1..BOOST_MAX_SIZETYPE_COUNT
> #define SIZETYPE(z, n, nil) \
> 	typedef char (&size ## n ## _t)[n]; \
> 	/**/

Careful; isn't the symbol "_t" reserved to the implementation in this context?

-- 
                       David Abrahams
   dave_at_[hidden] * http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution