Re: [boost] Re: Small thing: yes_type and no_type made public?

From: Paul Mensonides (pmenso57_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-01-08 15:37:04

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]>
To: "Boost mailing list" <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 12:14 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] Re: Small thing: yes_type and no_type made public?

> hartmutkaiser_at_[hidden] (Hartmut Kaiser) writes:
>
> >
> > //  The following expands to
> > //
> > // typedef char (&sizeN_t)[N];
> > //
> > //  for N = 1..BOOST_MAX_SIZETYPE_COUNT
> > #define SIZETYPE(z, n, nil) \
> > typedef char (&size ## n ## _t)[n]; \
> > /**/
>
> Careful; isn't the symbol "_t" reserved to the implementation in this
context?

I thought it was only if the underscore was followed by a capital letter, as
in "_T".

Paul Mensonides