Re: [boost] Re: Re: Re: Re: Review results: Optional library

From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-01-23 16:51:53

At 02:21 PM 1/23/2003, Fernando Cacciola wrote:
 >
 >"William E. Kempf" <wekempf_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
 >news:4132.167.16.75.51.1043397287.squirrel_at_frodo.kempf-ville.com...
 >> Fernando Cacciola said:
 >> > "William E. Kempf" <wekempf_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
 >> >> Fernando Cacciola said:
 >> >>  However, shouldn't you be using "run" instead of
 >> >> "unit-test" in the Jamfile?
 >> >>
 >> > Yes :-)  I was looking at the wrong examples.
 >> >
 >> > Fixed now. (could you re-test it?)
 >>
 >> $ bjam
 >> Jamfile: line 25: syntax error at keyword ;
 >> Jamfile: line 25: syntax error at keyword ;
 >> Jamfile: line 26: syntax error at keyword }
 >> Jamfile: line 26: syntax error at keyword }
 >> ....found 8 targets...
 >>
 >It looks like the syntax for the compile-fail (plus the <define>) is
 >wrong...
 >I've removed the fail cases altogether until I can test it myself so I
 >don't
 >abuse anymore of your time.
 >It runs only the ordinary test now
 >It should work I think.

Yes, works here.  I've added optional to the status/Jamfile.

Always keep in mind that the jam language is whitespace sensitive. I can't 
tell you how many times that caught me at first, although I got used to it 
after awhile.

--Beman