[boost] Re: Deadline for the Standard Library Technical Report

From: Gennaro Prota (gennaro_prota_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-01-24 16:50:42

On Fri, 24 Jan 2003 10:43:28 -0500, Beman Dawes <bdawes_at_[hidden]>
wrote:

>A "full proposal" must include proposed wording for the actual standardese 
>to go in the TR, as well as the usual supporting material. (Note that the 
>committee may not act on the proposal right away, or may request revisions 
>to the wording.)

If the committee requests a revision to the wording, does the library
"miss" the deadline or is it considered presented in time anyway?

>>If the committee sticks to its current schedule, any library proposal which 
>doesn't make the April deadline will suffer a delay of at least two years.

Is there any danger than then no other deadlines are set in the future
because the committee runs out of time? Or is it obligatory that many
"sessions" are set during the standardization path?

Genny.