[boost] Re: Re: Re: boost.threads: Thread pool

From: Michel André (michel.andre_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-01-25 18:06:16

>> Ok! Actually the only reason for me to want the old style is that it
>> will take longer for me to adopt 1.30 and later because I would have to
>> convince my CM guys to remake install and packaging, but thats more of a
>> political hurdle than a technical one. So it's ok. The only nitpick is
>> that maybe a version number in the dll name would seem good (not the lib
>> name).
>
>This should be happening with the stage rule, though I haven't confirmed.

Ok! I built the current CVS in the beginning of this week and got an
boost_thread.dll without version number. I didn't use boost.build v2 either
so maybe there are some differences between the old an new jamfiles and bjam
in this case, and it wasn't from the thread_dev branch. Will there also be
different names for debug and release dlls?

/Michel