Re: [boost] Re: Re: Re: boost.threads: Thread pool

From: William E. Kempf (wekempf_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-01-27 10:58:11

Michel André said:
>>> Ok! Actually the only reason for me to want the old style is that it
>>> will take longer for me to adopt 1.30 and later because I would have
>>> to convince my CM guys to remake install and packaging, but thats
>>> more of a political hurdle than a technical one. So it's ok. The only
>>> nitpick is that maybe a version number in the dll name would seem
>>> good (not the lib name).
>>
>>This should be happening with the stage rule, though I haven't
>> confirmed.
>
> Ok! I built the current CVS in the beginning of this week and got an
> boost_thread.dll without version number. I didn't use boost.build v2
> either so maybe there are some differences between the old an new
> jamfiles and bjam in this case, and it wasn't from the thread_dev
> branch. Will there also be different names for debug and release dlls?

I enabled the staging portion of the Jamfile on Friday, I believe.  It
does produce unique names for all variants.

William E. Kempf
wekempf_at_[hidden]