Re: [boost] Re: Deadline for the Standard Library TechnicalReport

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-01-29 08:57:08

Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr_at_[hidden]> writes:

> "David B. Held" <dheld_at_[hidden]> writes:
>
> | "Beman Dawes" <bdawes_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> | news:4.3.2.7.2.20030128144419.0229bfd8_at_mailhost.esva.net...
> | > [...]
> | > Anyone interested might want to read the actual proposal. See
> | > http://std.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2002/n1406.pdf
> | 
> | Yes, I found that on my own, and noticed that of the two "mutually
> | exclusive designs", the one with one feature was chosen over the
> | one with three features.
>
> In fact, these notions are not mutually exclusive.  There was a debate
> to that effect on the committee reflectors, recently.

Was it on "-core" or did I miss it somehow?

-- 
                       David Abrahams
   dave_at_[hidden] * http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution