Re: [boost] Re: Deadline for the Standard Library TechnicalReport

From: Gabriel Dos Reis (gdr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-01-29 11:55:04

David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> writes:

| Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr_at_[hidden]> writes:
| 
| > "David B. Held" <dheld_at_[hidden]> writes:
| >
| > | "Beman Dawes" <bdawes_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
| > | news:4.3.2.7.2.20030128144419.0229bfd8_at_mailhost.esva.net...
| > | > [...]
| > | > Anyone interested might want to read the actual proposal. See
| > | > http://std.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2002/n1406.pdf
| > | 
| > | Yes, I found that on my own, and noticed that of the two "mutually
| > | exclusive designs", the one with one feature was chosen over the
| > | one with three features.
| >
| > In fact, these notions are not mutually exclusive.  There was a debate
| > to that effect on the committee reflectors, recently.
| 
| Was it on "-core" or did I miss it somehow?

See c++std-ext-5658 and the whole thread that followed.  In fact, you
didn't miss it: You were the first person to reply... with the usual
reaction ;-] 

-- Gaby