|
Boost : |
From: David B. Held (dheld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-01-29 11:36:12
"Gabriel Dos Reis" <gdr_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:m3lm14zd6c.fsf_at_uniton.integrable-solutions.net...
> [...]
> More accurately, there are *two* notions being considered:
>
> 1) typedef template;
> 2) template aliasing -- the thingy Andrei is missing.
Could you clue us in on the current consensus? You would still express
2) using template typedefs, right? Is it possible or likely that the
proposal
will be altered to be more inclusive?
Dave
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk