[boost] Re: SmartPtr (Loki) - auto_ptr/move c'tor issue

From: David B. Held (dheld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-01-30 17:41:20

"Beman Dawes" <bdawes_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:4.3.2.7.2.20030130170421.022da230_at_mailhost.esva.net...
> [...]
> Which is the best approach is very application dependent. I never
> came to a firm conclusion as to which approach was better for
> smart pointers; both have advantages.

Well, we've managed to hobble along with "absolute orthogonality"
so far, so we'll see how long that pans out.  Seems to be holding up
pretty well.  It forces you to think very carefully about your design,
that's for sure.

Dave