From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-01-30 19:55:50
"David B. Held" <dheld_at_[hidden]> writes:
> "Beman Dawes" <bdawes_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
>> Which is the best approach is very application dependent. I never
>> came to a firm conclusion as to which approach was better for
>> smart pointers; both have advantages.
> Well, we've managed to hobble along with "absolute orthogonality"
> so far, so we'll see how long that pans out. Seems to be holding up
> pretty well. It forces you to think very carefully about your design,
> that's for sure.
What about the extra size due to the common compiler feature, "no
empty base optimization in the presence of MI?" That was another
problem solved by using a chain of policy templates.
-- David Abrahams dave_at_[hidden] * http://www.boost-consulting.com Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk